Friday, February 6, 2009
Some Girls are Clever
Thursday, February 5, 2009
For a Better Life
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
The God of...Better than That
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Just a Funny (twisted) Story
Melody for an Unknown Girl
The Definition of "Cool"
"What Is It?"
Monday, February 2, 2009
Let's Get Married!
Love is a Battlefield...part 27 or so
Mind Control and Free Will
Like God on high, I prefer that devotion be freely given. I feel the need to preface this entry with that statement that I am, essentially, at heart, and always, a big fan of free will. And that cannot help but color my remarks here.
Of course, I’m also right.
A psychologist friend of mine, living in a D/s relationship (He’s the “D”), confided to me that, with her enthusiastic consent, he has begun using hypnosis on his live-in girlfriend to reinforce her position as his slave. That is, he regularly hypnotizes her and plants post-hypnotic suggestions designed to increase her feelings of submission and devotion to him. Things like, “You will always feel pleasure from serving me in any way”, and, “Each day, your desire to serve me increases”. You get the idea, right?
Let me note that she’s totally in favor of the idea, and did freely agree/consent to it. It’s not like he “secretly” hypnotized her or whatever.
Anyway, they were both foolish enough to ask for my opinion on this practice. After a thoughtful pause, long enough to enjoy a large draught of an excellent
They, naturally enough, argued that since she freely consented to the hypnosis sessions, fully aware of their purpose, that it was not an abridgement of her free will. I suppose that might possibly be at least “true in a way”. But I don’t think that it’s ultimately true. No, if I were to do that sort of thing, I’ve no doubt that at some point I’d begin to feel – and quite uncomfortably so – that I’d rather more or less created a robot servant for myself. And robots, while useful and fun, are simply not the same thing as a person genuinely, willingly devoting themselves to you in freely-chosen submission. There’s nothing flattering, for instance, or particulary gratifying, about a robot doing simply what you’ve programmed it to do.
It is an interesting question, however, and, as alluded to above, it brought to my twisted mind the larger issue of God desiring love and devotion, but not willing to compel it in any way. Why doesn’t God just make everyone be good? – Answer: Because it wouldn’t mean anything then. Not to Him, nor to us. Likewise, I have no desire to “program” anyone in any way to slavishly devote themselves to me – because the genuine pleasure that I receive from a girl’s submission is very much wrapped up in the fact that she has freely chosen to offer herself to me in that way.
Plus, there's the simple fact that, knowing myself as I do, I know that, were I to indulge in such a practice, my wicked sense of humor would insist that I implant post-hypnotic suggestions like, "The next time you're in church, whenever you hear the word 'prayer', you will bark loudly three times, like a happy puppy".
Again, this is certainly a debatable issue.
But, again, I’m right. :)
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Simplified Master/slave Contract
Quick Question - Why Doesn't Anyone Like Babies Anymore?
Why doesn't anyone like babies anymore? I swear, all the women I meet nowadays are more afraid of getting pregnant than the girls I shamelessly slept with in college. I'm sure there was a period in there somewhere between those two points in my life where women secretly yearned to be "knocked up".
Random (but "on point") anecdote: I recall my time at university, when every girl was on "the pill" - you didn't even need to ask anymore, it just went without saying. Or so I thought. Until this darling, Catholic girl that I'd been sleeping with for about four months politely informed me that (A) she wasn't on the pill, nor doing anything else in the birth control line, and (B) she thought she might be "a little bit pregnant". Well, it turned out to be a false alarm, just one of those irregular period incidents (I warned her about playing field hockey!), but I did get her back a bit for stopping my heart there for a second or so. This occurred just before Christmas break, and while she was home with her parents, I sent her a "Mother To Be" greeting card...Hey, even in the most potentially frightening situations, my twisted sense of humor rarely deserts me.
Something I Read Someplace
"So I end with the reminder that marriage is not mainly about staying in love. It's about covenant keeping. And the main reason it is about covenant keeping is that God designed the relationship between a husband and his wife to represent the relationship between Christ and the church."
Well, I think what she’s getting at here is the notion that “Happily ever after” doesn’t mean “deliriously happy every moment of every day”. Brings to mind G.K. Chesterton’s great quote about the prince and princess living happily ever after…even though they likely occasionally threw dishes at each other. He also said something else, something or other about marriage being a perpetual crisis supported by a foundation of comfort. Possibly one of the few bright observations I ever made during my marriage was the confession, “Here’s the thing – I love you even when I don’t like you one little, flippin’ bit.” The commitment’s the thing, the faithfulness even during the “or worse” parts.
"This is the deepest meaning of marriage. And that is why ultimately the roles of headship and submission are so important. If our marriages are going to tell the truth about Christ and his church, we cannot be indifferent to the meaning of headship and submission."
We probably don’t think about this enough. In fact, I’m sure we don’t, and that goes a long way toward explaining the sorry state of marriages these days. It is really – if you do stop and really think about it – quite an incredible miracle that God managed to make it so that the fundamental relationship between man and woman is, indeed, a reflection of the fundamental relationship between God and mankind.
"And let it not go without saying that God's purpose for the church-and for the Christian wife who represents it-is her everlasting holy joy. Christ died for them to bring that about."
I could scribble ten more pages just on this bit alone. But I’m just going to select a couple of things to mention. First, one of the (ten thousand) things that drives me absolutely up the flippin’ wall is the failure of men to understand this bit at all. If you’ve got half a brain (unfortunately, most men don’t), then it ought to be crystal, blinding clear to you that if a woman submits herself to you, she’s submitting herself, ultimately, to your care. You’re responsible for her, in the same way that Christ accepts that “willing to die for” responsibility for the Church. She is trusting you in the same way that you’re supposed to trust God – that is, she’s taking the incredibly daring step of having faith that if she listens to you, then she will be wonderfully all right. And that trust places on you a responsibility that, frankly, ought to frighten the hell out of you, time to time. Yes, it’s great to have a live-in cocktail waitress (at least, I know I enjoy it), but that’s not what it’s bloody about. It’s about rescuing the princess from the dragon – the “dragon”, in this instance, being all the myriad horrors of this life. John Eldredge wrote something that I hope I never forget – “Every man needs an adventure to live, and a beauty to rescue. And every woman needs a dream to share, and a prince to rescue her.” And if you can’t understand that that is an infinitely more important, fulfilling, and downright happy-making notion than just the idea of getting your cock sucked on a regular basis…well, you’re a Goddamned fool.
my not-so-humble opinion,
Jack
"Beat Me, Hurt me, Show Me You Care"
One can't help but wonder (Can one?) about the rise of this social/psychological phenomenon. I mean, it must mean something, mustn't it? It can't simply be an accidental thing. There must be something in the evolution (and I do not in any way mean to equate that term with "progress forward") of our society that has led to this outbreak of women desiring painful pleasure.
I can only offer the most modest of guesses, but here it is. I believe that our society - especially in terms of relationships between men and women - has suffered an essential fracture of sorts, and that this breakage has resulted in both men and women suffering ever-increasing emotional frustration. All the various elements of this "fracture" are too numerous, and too complex, to go into here, but I'll just offer a quick notation of one: "Feminism", while it may have opened a few employment doors, has most assuredly not led to the goal of more overall societal satisfaction for women. If anything, it's had the opposite effect - burdening more and more women with the arduous task of being a single mother, and creating men so "sensitive" that they just make you want to throw up. And thus, I think at least a part of this is just a collective scream on the part of women for the bygone days when men were like Hemingway and Humphrey Bogart, a sort of ultra-frustrated cry of, "Jesus - Will you stop being such a weenie, and just club me over the head and rape me?"
And (I could be wrong about this next part, but Christ, what's the likelihood of that?) I also think there's a yearning on the part of women to be "taken". For all the glorifying of the single life, I believe the vast majority of women still ultimately desire the comfortable confines of marriage, family, and something called a "home" (not just a swanky midtown apartment). For that matter, I'd say the same applies to men. You live alone for awhile, being "owned" starts to look like not such a terrible alternative.
Well, I could go on, but I've no doubt that I've already said enough to start several enthusiastic fights. Let's be polite in our outraged screaming, all right?